this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
600 points (96.3% liked)

Fediverse

28465 readers
455 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
600
Lemmy.world seems to have banned the largest piracy community on Lemmy. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by satxdude@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
296 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

On the other hand, I really would not be surprised if they did have banworthy content on there.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

im not doubting the possibility, but not to even provide evidence to the servers admins is a red flag on pushing the ml dev/admins agendas without being transparent about it.

without a level of transparency, the same reason can be used to unjustfully ban anything.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And their agenda is... hating anime?

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

not liking something enough that you will on bias remove things. In this case, it was anime, but it could basically be applied to any viewpoints said admin would have then if they were that quick to react to just anime. It's the action and how it was handled and less the topic.

[–] spiderman@ani.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

we don't. i know the anime community on the internet doesn't have a good reputation but it's different here. @hitagi@ani.social makes sure of that.