this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
529 points (95.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12350 readers
409 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T156@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

This isn't a human rights violation, however. Lego is not a person.

But, Lego heads are their intellectual property, so they can stop that. The human rights part would be more of an issue for another organisation.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That’s what I’m saying, the human rights part is the only thing that matters in this issue. IP law is ultimately meaningless and a hinderance to society while privacy and human rights are a moral objection to what’s happening here.

What LEGO did does not fix the problem, prisoners will still be used as social media posts. They do not fundamentally care about those people, they just want to protect their brand.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 8 months ago

Not the human rights of Lego, rather the human rights of suspects or accused people.