this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
896 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59756 readers
2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 148 points 8 months ago (15 children)

First Roku did a quick force TOS change before a beach disclosure, now Blizzard is mysteriously forcing a change to their TOS. I have no idea what's coming next. Seems like it's going to become part of the breach playbook to minimize financial loss. Maybe there will be a law against it in... oh...15 years?

[–] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago (5 children)

So i'm not a lawyer but isn't there a law for unconsciability, When a contract is so one-sided, it's obvious that me the signer has absolutely no rights.The entire contract is voided.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I guess in return the signer gets the service?

[–] ra1d3n@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The signer gets the service because they paid for it. Mostly these are changed after people already bought the stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)