this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
1071 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
945 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works
1071
Homer (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 8 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Like, back in the 80’s and 90’s it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of.

I wonder what "pretty normal" is, according to actual numbers

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 28 points 7 months ago

I remember growing up in the 90's, my classmates and I all thought that one of the other kids was a liar because he said he didn't have a yard (he lived in an apartment). It didn't make sense - everyone else in the class of 30+ kids lived in a house with a yard, so he must just be making stuff up. Obviously that's anecdotal evidence, but still. It was weird for a kid not to live in a single-family home back then.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 7 months ago

You'd have to look at the size of the middle class back then, as that's what the "American Dream" scenario is based on there, but as a kid born in 1990, I can say that when my dad was looking for apartments when he was around college age in the 60s, the rule was not to rent an apartment that cost more than 25% of your salary. By the time I was around that same age in the late 2000s/early 2010s, it was 50% of your salary. Now, it's closer to 120% of your salary for those same apartments.