this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Framework Laptop Community

2661 readers
1 users here now

Related links:

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
uthredii@lemmy.ml
uthredii@programming.dev
2
@frameworkcomputer on masto: "Would you be interested in a raw machined aluminum chassis?" (fosstodon.org)
submitted 1 year ago by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/framework@lemmy.ml
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ky56@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not dismissing it just critiquing. There is a reason I'm still rocking this late-2013 MacBook Pro. Apple MacBook Pro 2016 and onwards are a total showstopper for me for an evolving list of reasons.

I use my laptop for an almost equal share of movies/tv and general work/programming. So black bars being bigger are potentially annoying. The speaker downgrade is also not great, not that things are great on this machine either. Stupid rubber has disintegrated and the speakers are now worthless.

However the measly 3 ports on the framework when you using the powersupply is a reason I'm holding off. Given that I understand the architectural limitations, all I'm asking for from framework is two builtin usb-c ports running at 2.0 speeds with PD support. I think there would be room at the back between the rear-most module and the display. This means I can charge from either side and have 5 ports left over. 4 hi-speed ports and 1 usb 2.0. That plus bringing the new dual driver speakers from the new 16" would make me very happy.

Heck even Apple backpedaled on only 4 usb-c ports in 2020. It's too low a number of ports.