this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
30 points (85.7% liked)

AI Generated Images

7182 readers
120 users here now

Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.

No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.

This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.

Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.

No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.

AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.

To embed images type:

“![](put image url in here)”

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.

Community Challenge Past Entries

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
thelsim@sh.itjust.works
god@sh.itjust.works
noodle@sh.itjust.works
theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz
M0oP0o@mander.xyz
Deceptichum@quokk.au
30
What AIs is everyone using? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago by Reverendender@sh.itjust.works to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

And how much do they cost? And how do you like them?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What if I have quad 12-core Xeons with 196GB of RAM?

I have a 24-core i9-13900 and 128GB of RAM and I briefly tried it and recall it being what I'd call unusably slow. That being said, I also just discovered that my water cooler's pump has been broken and the poor CPU had been running with zero cooling for the past six months and throttling the bajesus out of itself, so maybe I'd be possible to improve on that a bit.

If you seriously want to try it, I'd just give it a spin. Won't cost you more then the time to download and install it, and you'll know how it performs. And you'll get to try the UI.

I just don't want to give the impression to people that they're gonna be happy with on-CPU performance and then have them be disappointed, hence the qualifiers.

EDIT: Here's a fork designed specifically for the CPU that uses a bunch of other optimizations (like the turbo "do a generation in only a couple iterations" thing, which I understand has some quality tradeoffs) that says that it can get down into practical times for a CPU, just a couple of seconds. It can't do 1024x1024 images, though.

https://github.com/rupeshs/fastsdcpu

I haven't used it, though. And I don't think that that "turbo" approach lets you use arbitrary models.