In response to Joe Biden and the White House enabling ActivityPub federation via Threads, a number of people asked: "Why didn't the White House just self-host their own Mastodon server?"

Here's some very basic musings on what it would take for that to happen. and what some of the hurdles are. Don't consider it a definitive answer, but a jumping-off point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago (12 children)

Would be entertaining to watch it unfold. I'm sure team 45 would try to horn in if it happened. Might bring a massive influx of users. Mixed feelings. But a good writeup.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Truth Social is already literally a Mastodon instance. They just don't federate with anything else.

Trump could open up federation, but that would ruin their safe space, I mean echo chamber.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They would also be instantly defederated by like 90% of the fediverse

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And 9% of the rest would just be griefing them

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Gab is in kind of the same place, with the same conclusion.

"Oh no, keeping a walled garden actually increases the value of my echo chamber! Better not open anything up to dissenting views!"

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)