Boozilla

joined 1 year ago
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

They make use it at my job. I hate it.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I totally get that.

Check out Textpad. You might like it. The only nuisance with it is the default config settings are a little oddball (things like keyboard shortcuts, etc). But it's highly configurable so you can set it up the way you like and then it's good. It has more features than Notepad, but it's still pretty simple and can do cool things like search files / folders for strings, has regex support, etc. But the extras stay out of your way and it's pretty clean and simple for "notepad-like" usage.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thank you for writing this. Small typo: focued (focused).

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The Facebook bots are probably trying to make every lesser site feel bad about itself by comparing them to the much cooler and popular sites.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Suckers. People point and laugh at me for free.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I checked my "content library" and I still have the option to download. Which is good, as I back everything up in Calibre. Maybe there are some regional factors here, or it may depend on which Kindle device(s) you own?

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

I feel like the NFL is maybe leaving money on the table here, and is too greedy and out of touch to even see it. I could be wrong, but I bet if they charged, say, $5 to watch any out-of-market game the customer wants, they would make a killing.

Instead, they charge like $400 or something for all of the out-of-market games. Most people aren't going to pay that much. Especially if they only care about one team that's out of their area.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for the update! I would like to keep using it. I've been very happy with Bitwarden both as a password manager and a TOTP authenticator. I have even recommended it to my boss as an enterprise solution for us to use at work, and so far we are planning on replacing our current password database solution with Bitwarden.

Unfortunately, with "enshittification" being so common these days, it was very easy to believe they were also going to the dark side. I will remain cautiously optimistic after learning it was a packaging bug.

Here's a link to the post on X (yes, I hate X, too) in case anyone else is doubtful:

https://x.com/Bitwarden/status/1848135725663076446

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yup, thanks. Was thinking along these same lines.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Goddammit. It's getting to the point I'm going to have to figure out how to write my own app for this.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not against passkeys. They have some real advantages. And I understand more than you think.

My comment is primarily about the preferred ecosystems that tend to come along with these newer solutions (like Apple's iCloud or Google's Password Manager) and how the corporations take advantage of user laziness and bandwagon jumping.

They may not force you to be exclusive with them, but they definitely want you to be. And over time they will likely make it more and more inconvenient not to be locked in with them.

For contrast, I use BitWarden for password management and Bitwarden Authenticator for TOTP (and I keep safe copies of TOTP secret keys elsewhere). This is a generic open-standards-first approach to things, with relatively easy recovery should you lose something. You can export your passwords. You have copies of your secret keys. You are in no way locked in to BitWarden forever.

Passkeys can also work within that type of operational framework! Like TOTP which normally uses RFC6238, Passkeys tend to use CTAP or WebAuthn. All of the above are open standards. And this is a good thing!

But do you really think Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc, want to play nice long term? Hopefully they will. But I have also run into evil nonsense like LastPass, which even though they also used open standards, their software would not allow you to do simple things like recover your own secret keys, export your data, etc. (Not to mention the embarrassing security breach they had and the wretched response, the main reasons to dump them).

While I am not directly comparing an idiot company like GoTo Tech with Apple et al, they all have the same types of big brain MBA types working for them who love to constantly brainstorm new ideas on how to screw the users over by taking features away and calling it a "software upgrade".

So, passkeys as a security mechanism: sure, this gets my vote. But trusting the big corporations not to change the rules on us later....come on, get real. They love limiting or removing portability and recovery options whenever they can.

Bottom line: don't assume passkeys are inherently good or bad. It's simply a security standard that can work well if implemented correctly. Passkeys make logging in easier. But will they also make recovery / export / migration easier....? Because if it's not easy, people won't do it.

 

Not asking for tech support here, just wondering if in theory it would be possible to create a plug-in or even a complete browser that blocks ads in a way that's impossible to detect. One model that comes to mind is a quarantined / containerized non-blocking virtual browser which queries the web server directly, then the UX filters the content from that container and presents it to the user ad-free. As far as the web server can tell, the containerized browser is just vanilla Chromium.

view more: next ›