this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
852 points (99.4% liked)

Linux

48287 readers
638 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That's not how governments work

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Why not both?

Let's say MS charges $5M a year.

Their support contract, assuming they get one, for libre office might be $1M.

They could still invest another $1M in OSS and still save $3M

A $1M net gain for OSS and a $3M savings for the govt.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 months ago

That’s still not how governments work

It would be nice if it worked like that, but we both know it doesn't

[–] barbara@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

That's called a pareto optimum

[–] TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

In reality it's gonna be something like:

M$ charges 5M €. Libreoffice might be 1M € so they will give 1M € to OSS and waste the remaining 3M € on some overly expensive one-time crap like car infrastructure. Later they will realize that they had understaffed their IT department and will need extra 5M € paid by more state debt.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

That, again, is not how governments work.
What you depict is how companies work: You save amount X on something, so there are X moneys left to invest in something.
Governments work with separated and highly regulated budgets. That is sometimes bullshit, but sometimes necessary to make sure government aids are spent fairly, for example. So: You save amount X on something, you aren't allowed to just give this amount to someone. There has to be either a program, a law, or (most often) an entirely different budget somewhere else that this someone is allowed to receive.

So the “trade-off” logic cannot be fulfilled by governments, and it shouldn't be. Think about the myriad of bullshit, money would just be dumped into by the government if this wasn't the case. On top of the myriad of bullshit that already made it through the nets, that is.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

Well think again, Germany invests in open source.

https://sciencebusiness.net/news/cybersecurity/germany-launch-sovereign-tech-fund-secure-digital-infrastructure

The fund will rise with the savings for sure