this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
64 points (92.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40359 readers
304 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For years I've been running my Nextcloud on bare metal. Now I finally decided to switch it to docker. I looked into Nextcloud All-In-One and it seems easy to deploy but it lacks configuration options like multiple domain names and putting it behind a traefik reverse proxy is kind of a pain to set up.

You can check out my solution on GitHub. I decided on a docker compose setup with nginx, php-fpm and redis(redis is now replaced by KeyDB) in separate containers. Obviously it's for experts but it's a lot more configurable. than AIO. It's also just as easy to migrate to as with any bare metal setup and just as configurable.Yes it's still a pain to set up, but better than the bare metal version lol

What do you guys think about putting the different components (webserver, php, redis, etc.) in separate containers like this, as compared to all in one? Feedback is greatly appreciated!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

NextCloud’s trusted_proxies setting supports CIDR notation, so it mught be better to set the subnet of Traefik’s network as opposed to the IP address. That way, if you ever need to do anything with the container (I.e. upgrade traefik), the IP can change but the subnet is less likely to change.

[–] flor0@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

True. That's a good improvement. Thanks a lot! By the way do you know if the nextcloud trusted_proxies setting allows for hostnames such as "traefik" as compared to just IP addresses?

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The documentation seems to suggest just IP address and CIDR notation.

[–] flor0@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Alright, thanks a lot! You probably saved me a lot of headache in the future

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 1 points 7 months ago

No problem! It’s a small change that might not affect most people :)