Games

16796 readers

850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

273

Original Fallout lead Tim Cain loves the new show, but remains baffled by how 'destructive' fans can act toward 'people who are trying to create things' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cain appreciated the performances and storytelling, but singled out how the show nailed the Fallout "vibe" as its biggest achievement. "I was just looking at all the props," he said of one scene. "I realized after a few minutes went by that I had not followed the dialogue at all, because I was so engrossed by it visually."

On a more sour note, Cain took time to address the way fans of the series can behave poorly online, particularly regarding any perceived rivalry between Fallout entries developed by Bethesda (3, 4, and 76), and those from Interplay, Black Isle, and Obsidian (1, 2, and New Vegas). Cain spoke positively of Todd Howard, and said that "Some of the stuff you [series fans] say online is so off." See also: the debate about whether the show somehow overrode or ignored the events of those non-Bethesda games, which has since been denied by a senior developer at the studio.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I only watched the first episode and skimmed through most of it as it was kinda boring.

Does it get better?

[–] L3mmyW1nks@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What kind of shows are you able to watch when you already need to skim the first episode setting the mood/vibe of the show? TikTok?

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Shows that are captivating and offer a glimpse of the long term mystery?

Now the first episode of the Expanse had the same flow; introduce the different character groups, world build, and set events into motion.

It ended with multiple different character arcs in motion - an investigation, political drama, lost in space. Fallout had 3 people set off to start their arc maybe next episode? Vault girl leaves, Brotherhood guy leaves, Ghoul leaves.

The Expanse pulled it off fucking fantastically whereas Fallout just felt flat to me.

[–] dog@suppo.fi 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not feeling great about the show. Sure it's pretty, but it's so slow.

Maybe that's a deliberate choice, but as the first episode is, I give it a 7/10.

Not great, not good, but okay.

[–] Juvyn00b@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Agreed. I think for the way they had to cut it up and introduce so many seemingly "key" characters, it really dragged on for me until about mid way. And I still didn't have a good handle on the world as a whole at that point. Feeling like I'm missing something the whole time makes me not want to continue.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://www.ratingraph.com/tv-shows/fallout-ratings-116450/

People like the later episodes more

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can I just say thank you for being the only person to actually answer my question. If that’s the case I might try to power through a few more.

One more question though, it goes from 8.5 to 8.9; is that a big increase?

It sounds like very little but for all I know 99% of shows could be rated from 7-9, where it would be more impactful.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That site visualizes the per-episode reviews from IMDb so its only as good as its dataset.

I find it most useful when choosing between shows, if I know that a series falls of a cliff if the later seasons I might choose something more consistent instead.

My advice would be to search a couple of other series you know and see what their numbers look like. That should give you a benchmark.