this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
1038 points (91.8% liked)

Memes

45704 readers
1121 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, then don't.

Go find another place to live.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the punchline of this joke. You can't. They're all like this.

Stop pretending the free market provides infinite choices that we can jump to if we don't like something. That's not a thing outside of like, some consumer goods.

[–] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not pretending.

I'm pointing out the flaw it the whining.

There's a lot of should and shouldn't statements that are just wish fulfillment and not reality.

Now that you're done bitching about the housing crisis...what's your actual proposed solution?

Should we take the home from the guy renting you that apartment so you can have it? Force lower rents, leaving him unmotivated to bother renting it?

What's your point beyond rents are too high? We all know there's a problem, how do you propose we fix it, because landlords aren't the root of the issue but this whole thread seems to want to pretend they are.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

They are the market. Who else sets prices other than landlords? How can a "rent is too high" issue not be a landlord issue?

It's a greed issue. "They get x amount so I should too." Then someone decides it's a new year so the prices go up and the same thing happens (now accelerated by algorithms that grab data about market prices) and the landlords look around again and say "they're getting more so I should too, it would be stupid for me not to!"

Who else sets the prices for them to be too high in the first place if not landlords?

My uneducated solution is price caps based on some calculation of a typical income for the local area (NOT a family income, we don't need more of this "2 people are required" bullshit.) If that means some people that could afford more are getting cheap rent I don't care as long as it means the typical Joe who can't afford to buy has options that don't leave them perpetually unable to save. If that leaves some people unmotivated to rent that's fine too, in my experience there are plenty of homeowners who want/need to rent their basement/garage/etc to cover their expenses.