Linux

48287 readers

590 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

101

When do you consider a system to be bloated? (lemdro.id)

submitted 7 months ago by governorkeagan@lemdro.id to c/linux@lemmy.ml

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I often hear folks in the Linux community discussing their preference for Arch (and Linux in general) because they can install only the packages they want or need - no bloat.

I've come across users with a couple of hundred packages installed (likely fresh installs), but I've also seen others with thousands.

Personally, I'm currently at 1.7k packages on my desktop and 1.3k on my laptop (both running EndeavourOS). There might be a few packages I could remove, but I don't feel like my system is bloated.

I guess it's subjective, but when do you consider a system to be bloated?

I'm asking as a relatively new Linux user - been daily driving for about 7/8 months

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would probably add (as a couple of others have already mentioned) if it slows down the update process by pulling loads of software/dependencies that I'm not using.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Who sits and watches the update process?

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Me, occasionally. I like seeing the little Pac-Man eat away at progress of a download on EndeavourOS.

Also, this video covers it slightly.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Oh god, the "your computer slows down over time" BS from people who have no idea what they are talking about so "fuck it - just nuke and reinstall".

Remove repos you aren't using. Uninstall / purge things you don't want anymore. If you don't know how to fix it then you'll just re-do everything that made it "slow" again.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

Maybe not watching it per se, but it's nice to catch a problem before I reboot (ie a grub upgrade failure for example)

[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People that live in a place where 4 mbps speeds are a norm.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

People that live in a place where 4 mbps speeds are a norm.

Why? That's an even worse place to sit and watch your updates. apt update && apt upgrade -y then do something else while it runs and check in later.

[–] poinck@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gentoo user here. I look at system load while compiling. (: But most of the time I can use my PC while portage is doing it's job.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I mean, for Gentoo users an update is a bit like "track day". So I can understand that. 😀

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago

Who watches the watcher?