this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
103 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
632 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just though I'd share

Edit: I'm not sure if this actually works. All else fails fall back to Ansible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All else fails fall back to Ansible

Fucking hell. THAT far back?

We were doing everything Ansible does for the 95% case in 2002. Like, for 95% of use-cases, Ansible is absolutely no better than a conglomeration of tools from 2002. Definitely no reason to pay licensing.

Bonus: since it's version-agnostic (another win over Ansible if you've ever managed Tower/AAP/whatever next week) I'm still using that paradigm today because it works SO well. It's losing to Cinc or mgmtConfig but only because those are 1 and 2 generations newer than Ansible and do offer distinguishing features.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ansible is foss, free of cost and requires almost no additional overhead or hardware.

It isn't the best sometimes but if you have a bunch of machines to manage it works great. (Assuming they aren't behind a NAT)

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Ansible is foss, free of cost and requires almost no additional overhead or hardware.

Um, why are you stressing foss ? I only ask because the 2002 kit was

  • cron
  • make
  • awk
  • at
  • rpm

'It's foss' isn't really a selling point, here, since ansible is still outmatched by everything else available -- including that gaggle of tools from 22 years ago.

... which was foss.

The only thing Ansible has going for it is momentum; and cult-people who haven't seen Chef or even that aforementioned tool-bag. Heaven forbid someone sees MgmtConfig converging 1000 machines in under a second immediately after a file is changed on one (ergo no playbook run taking 10 minutes). They'd be crying every day afterward that they were still stuck on worse-than-2002-technology Ansible. At 2002, Ansible pre-dates GOOGLE MAPS for technology; and facebook; and the iPhone. Ansible is the MapQuest Printout of technology.

The new tech is so reactive, it can revert a file back to conformity immediately after it's saved; before it can be reopened!

AND IT'S STILL OPEN SOURCE. Of course. Because that's a no-brainer.