Linux

48310 readers

645 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Ubuntu Snap Hate (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by Tekkip20@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've gathered that a lot of people in the nix space seem to dislike snaps but otherwise like Flatpaks, what seems to be the difference here?

Are Snaps just a lot slower than flatpaks or something? They're both a bit bloaty as far as I know but makes Canonicals attempt worse?

Personally I think for home users or niche there should be a snap less variant of this distribution with all the bells and whistles.

Sure it might be pointless, but you could argue that for dozens of other distros that take Debian, Fedora or Arch stuff and make it as their own variant, I.e MX Linux or Manjaro.

What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Snaps are proprietary, flatpacks are not, is the long and short of it

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago

The store is SaaS (service as a software substitute) and not necessary proprietary

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They are not. But the store is proprietary and snapd doesnt allow other stores. You could patch snapd to allow other stores though and the format is open

[–] d_k_bo@feddit.de 17 points 7 months ago

Snaps are just as “open source” as “Office Open XML” (.docx, .pptx etc.) are open file formats.

If there isn't a fully open source software stack, it isn't really open source.

[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't "just patch it" to make snap work with another store. Instead what you've done is invented an entirely different store, which you're now going to have to maintain. It is never going to be upstreamed to Canonical. You are going to be in a perpetual tug-of-war with Canonical driving snap development towards their own needs and not your own.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not proprietary though

It is SaaS (service as a software substitute) and vendor lock in