this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
558 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 20 points 7 months ago (13 children)

The problem isn't actually just that China takes our data, it's that they control the algorithm on tiktok for what users see, thereby giving them the ability to manipulate the public.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Yeah! And that's only a privilege for white oligarchs! /s

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Would you rather a hostile foreign entity do it instead, who have vested interest in sewing destructive chaos as a goal, though? That's the alternative.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean, there's a third alternative where manipulating us is illegal for anyone

[–] card797@champserver.net 1 points 7 months ago

That's just too vague to legislate. Stop talking to everyone because you're being manipulated non-stop by everyone you know.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree, wish this was the actual goal but it's going to be hard to pry those rights out of their hands.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

if they were rights everyone would have them.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)