this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You can’t get rid of it, you can only hide it: Microsoft imposes controversial Windows Backup on users::Like it or not, the Windows Backup app installed in Windows 10 and Windows 11 is here to stay, with Microsoft calling it a "system component" that can't be

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what do you mean by this

do u think a cloud pc (with constant server costs) shouldnt be a monthly fee?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this is likely the "new only Windows option" in the not so distant future. I think it shouldn't exist.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what will be the host from which you will run Cloud PC? Linux, macOS?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What sick moronic idiot would want a cloud pc that's accessible via... a pc

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Their primary use is enterprise not private consumers. Think of virtualized OS accessible over internet that you can manage/protect and provide for example to some random consultant. Or just provide more powerful PC on low end HW.

It's costly though and not sure it ever gained traction because there always were alternatives like Citrix Desktops.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe there's a use case, but I'm anti-cloud and always will be. I struggle to think of a situation I couldn't do better with in-house (or even air gapped) VMs of my own.

Anyone who watches 365 uptime knows that Microsoft's cloud is a fragile laughing stock. They use a Twitter account because their own status portal is so laughably trash and unreliable. If you don't believe me I don't blame you. Here it is.

The day I trust any cloud platform (Especially Microsoft) is the day I promise to jump off a cliff.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Exactly. The term "cloud" is just code for "someone else's computer" and as you say, there's very little that cannot be done without it. And once you entrust your data to someone else's hardware, all you really have are assurances and probabilities that what you expect will happen with it becomes what actually happens with it. No guarantees.

And you pay for all this, monthly, until the end of time.

I don't blame anyone that wants to go that route, I use a freebie bit of cloud for phone photos myself, but anything of more import, nah. More "cloud" for everyone else, I suppose, because they can have my share.