this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
757 points (97.4% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1127 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 180 points 7 months ago (19 children)

Here's the thing though, these games are highly reviewed and played but it may still in fact be more profitable to keep pumping out mid tier trash. For companies that have long forgotten the time when they had a soul and were a group of passionate gamers, that's all that matters.

[–] detinu@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Exactly. Ubisoft is the perfect example of this. Assassin's Creed, Far Cry, Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, R6. They used to take risks and try to push gaming forward with amazing ideas and design that made my kid brain explode.

Now those IPs are dead or extremely stale. And it's because releasing an AC with microtransactions makes them more money than making an offline single player Splinter Cell. Or releasing a skin for 20 euros for R6 siege makes them a huge profit for the time invested in creating it.

God I wish we'd get a new single player Splinter Cell. Some of my best memories I have as a kid are playing the original Splinter Cell. Even if we do, it'll be riddled with microtransactions and will fail to capture the magic of the original games.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago (8 children)

It's strange though, because Ubisoft on paper should be something I hate, but when I actually play one (and I'm a single player gamer), they've got fun gameplay, and the store, although it is there, generally keeps out the way and when I accidentally press the button in the menu that goes into it, there's nothing I'd ever consider handing over actual money for. The game never points you at it, or makes you feel it's needed.

I don't even know who it's for. Who buys cosmetics in a single player game? It genuinely feels like it's just been put in to appease the beancounters.

That said I don't get excited enough to buy them at full price, and normally wait until they're on PSPlus or something. There's nothing in most of these AAA games to truly love. They're a sea of merely "alright", and they're all way too long.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There's nothing in most of these AAA games to truly love. They're a sea of merely "alright", and they're all way too long.

But why bother with alright when there's thousands of highly regarded indie games out there for a quarter of the price?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago

Probably same reason people go to McDonald's.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The largest issue with indie games is simply discoverability. I’m sure there are tons of amazing indie games out there. But you need to wade through a sea of complete fucking garbage to get to them. Meanwhile, AAA studios can spend thousands of dollars on marketing. Unless an indie game goes viral, there’s very little chance that I’ll ever hear about it in order to consider buying it.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 3 points 7 months ago

Meanwhile, AAA studios can spend thousands of dollars on marketing.

I don't really get the notion of listening to some marketing department lying through their teeth. It's not like AAA games ever deliver on their marketing promises.

Unless an indie game goes viral, there’s very little chance that I’ll ever hear about it in order to consider buying it.

You don't have to go dumpster diving in order to find awesome games, somebody already did. A good starting point is the top rated games list for Steam: https://steamdb.info/stats/gameratings/

90% of them are indies and there is something for everyone on those 3 pages.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's honestly what astounds me sometimes, but I guess it makes sense. There's heart, soul, and passion in an indie game made by a small team.

AAA games fall victim to the "designed by committee" sameness and just-good-enough gameplay.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)