this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
162 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

48338 readers
730 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A bare metal OS is an OS running outside of a hypervisor. Virt-manager is a class 1 hypervisor that allows you to host guest operating systems. ( Run vms )

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hey sorry for the confusion. What I meant is Proxmos is considered as a bare metal hypervisor and Virt manager is a hypervisor inside an OS, right?

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Technically no, both use kvm virtualization which is included in the Linux kernal, so both are "bare metal hypervisors" other wise know as class 1 hypervisors. Distinctions can be confusing 😂

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh dear... I really thought I understood what bare metal means... But looks like this is beyond my tech comprehension

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bare metal is "kernel running on hardware" I think. KVM is a kernel feature, so the virtualization is done in kernel space (?) and on the hardware.

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well this can be a starting point of a rabbit hole. Time to spend hours reading stuff that I don't really understand.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

TL;DR: use what is in the kernel, without strange out of tree kernel modules like for VirtualBox, and use KVM, i.e. on fedora virt-manager qemu qemu-kvm

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

They both use KVM in the end, so they are both Type 1 hypervisors.

Loading the KVM kernel module turn your kernel into the bare metal hypervisor.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

*Proxmox

Virtual manager is a application that connects to libvirtd in the back end. Think of it as a web browser or file manager for VMs.

Proxmox VE is an entire OS built for virtualization on dedicated servers. It also has support for clusters and live VM migrations between hosts. It is in essence a server OS designed to run in a data center (or homelab) of some kind. If is sort of equivalent to vSphere but they charge you per CPU socket for enterprise support and stability

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well this thread clearly established that I neither have technical knowledge and I don't pay attention to spelling...

Jokes aside this is a good explanation. I have seen admins using vSphere and it kind of makes sense. I'm just starting to scratch the surface of homelab, and now started out with a raspberry pie. My dream is a full fledged self sustaining homelab.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you ever want to get a Proxmox cluster go for 3-5 identical machines. I have a 3 totally different machines and it creates headaches

[–] DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What kind of headaches are you having? I've been running two completely different machines in a cluster with a pi as a Qdevice to keep quorum and it's been incredibly stable for years.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

One device decided to be finicky and the biggest storage array is all on one system.

It really sucks you can't do HA with BTRFS. It is more reliable than ZFS due to licensing

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's the licensing part you mentioned? Can you elaborate a little?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

OpenZFS is not GPL compatible so it can never be baked into the kernel in the same way BTRFS can. I've run into issues where I've needed to downgrade the kernel but if I do the system won't boot.

Btrfs also doesn't need any special software to work as it is completely native and baked in.