this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
48 points (86.4% liked)

Linux

48287 readers
608 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ubuntu has too many problems for me to want to run it. However, it has occurred to me that there aren't a lot of distros that are like the Ubuntu LTS.

Basic requirements for a LTS:

  • at least 2 years of support
  • semi recent versions of applications like Chrome and Firefox (might consider flatpak)
  • a stable experience that isn't buggy
  • fast security updates

Distros considered:

  • Debian (stable)
  • Rocky Linux
  • openSUSE
  • Cent OS stream
  • Fedora

As far as I can tell none of the options listed are quite suitable. They are either to unstable or way to out of date. I like Rocky Linux but it doesn't seem to be desktop focused as far as I can tell. I would use Debian but Debian doesn't have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah I do not want Arch or recent packages. I want something I can set and forget.

Right now Pop OS and Linux mint seem like the best options even though they both lack the support of a larger company.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Both Pop and Mint offload much of the heavy lifting to Ubuntu. They are not rolling everything from scratch.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

True, but unlike Ubuntu they get it right

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

I was responding to “they both lack the support of a larger company”.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I run Mint Cinnamon. It's been Rock solid for me. You can modify, add, remove whatever you want. With Flatpacks you are mostly up to date. If you want to install a newer kernel you can, and if you have Timeshift running and something breaks, you just roll back.

I see Mint as an Un-enshittified Ubuntu.

I find cinnamon very frienly and comfortable, which I need in a daily driver. To play I have things like NixOS. I could Arch, but I'm not vegan. :)

That said, I'm giving Fedora Kinoite (Atomic) a try in a VM

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Arch can definitely be a "set & forget" type of distro. Just install it, use it correctly, and that's really it. No need to upgrade to new releases; just keep the system up to date....

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to keep the system up to date

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Fair enough....

[–] sparr@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

just keep the system up to date…

The idea that downloading gigabytes of packages every week is a normal and required aspect of using a computer is part of why I left Windows...

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't have to be every week. Could be every other week or at least once a month. I haven't used Windows since 2002, but personally, I update once a week, and it never takes all that long, maybe 2-3 minutes tops. But I understand that it's not for everyone....

[–] sparr@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

2-3 minutes on what kind of internet connection? How long at 10Mbps?

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Computer is connected to the router via ethernet. The connection to the router is I believe fiber optics....