this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
413 points (98.6% liked)

Greentext

4459 readers
730 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They use a mixture of both depending on suspect and observed operational security measures. It's much easier to leave a phone on at home while you go meet up with your connection, and if you drive an older car and don't take any WiFi enabled or Bluetooth-connected devices (sports watches, BT earbuds, hiking gear, satellite radio, etc) then a physical tracker can guarantee much better data.

The nice thing about location-based data (not tower pings) is they don't require a warrant, or even law-enforcement personnel. It's open data on the free market. Great for dumb criminals.

I'm available for security consulting. /s (^/s) Unfortunately most are more interested in convenience than privacy and security.