this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
283 points (99.0% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1127 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 47 points 6 months ago (26 children)

What's the context here? I've never played it, but I thought it was generally well-liked. I'm guessing the publisher is up to some nonsense?

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 85 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

Few days ago Sony announced through arrowhead (the developer) that you had to have a PSN (PlayStation Network) account linked to your steam account or you would not be able to play through steam. PSN is not available in certain regions that steam is, and so now a bunch of people who have bought the game and sank hours into it have no way of creating and linking a PSN account and will no longer be able to play a game they paid for. People are also throwing this on the “don’t take my info” bandwagon as well, but the real travesty is the people who paid for it that will no longer be able to play.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I would love to listen in on the meeting that decided this. How did they think this was remotely a good idea

[–] Cagi@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Their justification is that they need the PSN to moderate the community; right now they can't ban anyone, and only didn't launch with this requirement because it wasn't ready. But now the temporary grace period is ending. You need to agree to terms and services by signing up for PSN, including PSN codes of conduct they enforce in every game. Without that, they can't ban you for conduct you didn't agree to.

The counter argument is that they didn't make it clear enough that this was an eventuality, and that they could and should find alternate means to moderate their PC community that doesn't exclude so many players.

I suspect this is more about policing third party monetization than community moderation.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

Wait no, this doesn't make sense. Other games easily ban their own players from Steam. For easily available example, Rust.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)