this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
765 points (86.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12350 readers
480 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's not really a word

Since it's used to convey meaning using letters and people understand that meaning, it by any definition that matters IS a word.

Also it clearly implies something is inherent to "Caucasians"

No. "Particularly Caucasians" ≠ "all Caucasians".

I can't be bothered to do any clever wordplay on the other supposed racial categories

Good, because that would likely be punching down, unlike pointing out how audacious some white people are with their privilege.

but I suspect any equivalent puns might be considered a little problematic, what what?

No, they wouldn't be equivalent. Pointing out white privilege and criticizing those that wield it as both a sword and a shield is not the same as making fun of less privileged people or even white people who are aware of and don't exploit their privilege.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So, racism bad, except against white people?

Lol no

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So, racism bad, except against white people

Nope. Pointing out that someone is being racist isn't itself racist.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was referring to the whole "punching down" concept.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Still not racism against white people.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No? Isn't the whole idea that it's okay to say things about white people that it isn't okay to say about other races?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. The idea is that it's okay to say things about white RACISTS that it would make no sense saying about any other people, white or not.

"White racist" isn't any more a race than for example "black embezzler" or "Japanese bigamist"

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so if I say "man these Black criminals are ruining our city", then it's alright to backpedal when confronted and say "oh obviously I only meant specific Black people"?

Or, different example in the same sphere. Is it okay for a Black person to be racist against white people?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've had it with your ridiculous strawmen. I've told you what you need to know (that white people aren't inherently racist and it's therefore not racist to call out racism, including racism specific to white racists) and you keep trying to twist it into something it's not.

I don't know if you're a racist yourself, if you're just a pedant, or if you really believe that you have a valid and important point, but you don't. Not even close.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

I ask because, in the first example, that's basically your use of "caucasity" but with a different race. The second example is a classic one that proponents of the "punching down" philosophy use - people have told me they believe it's actually impossible for black people to be racist against whites, because that's "punching up".