Games

16785 readers

850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

324

Great moments in PC gaming: That time Valve released three new games on the same day (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They don't make money on their current Deck. Well, maybe now they do make a little but when it was designed other RDNA2 based systems were running around a grand.

They'd lose more money on it, but depending on how many games Deck owners are buying in '33 they could make it up.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They didn't lose money on it. It's just that they made so little no other company would mess with making something like it for such small margins.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just knew they said the price point was painful and I saw what other systems were selling for. I was making a guess about being a loss leader because consoles have done that in the past.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

Yes. I've looked at a lot of production break downs of publicly traded companies before on what electronic and phone manufacturers pay in parts and it is so much cheaper than you would think some items could even be made for. They might have been losing a bit on the cheapest $360 one, but I'd bet they made a bit on the mid and top tier.