this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
421 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40296 readers
344 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 62 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I wouldn't if I could avoid it. The "fun" of tinkering with IT stuff in my very limited spare time vaporized many years ago. If I could pay for services that did exactly what I wanted, respected my privacy, and valued my business while charging a fair price, I would stop self-hosting tomorrow. But that's not usually how it works.

Self hosting isn't super high maintenance once you get everything set up but it still takes up probably 10-12 hours per month on average and I would not mind having that time back.

[–] aard@kyu.de 11 points 5 months ago

I nowadays manage my private stuff with the ansible scripts I develop for work - so mostly my own stuff is a development environment for work, and therefore doesn't need to be done on private time.

[–] peregus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With Proton you could get emails, calendar, contacts, drive for a fair price and good privacy, for example.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I like the idea, but I don't like that everything is tied to a single account. If it's compromised so are your emails, calendar, contacts, files, and passwords. But the service is good enough to replace Google, and choosing between the two, I'd choose Proton.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mail servers are the one thing I refuse to self host. Years of managing enterprise email taught me that I don't need that kind of negativity in my life

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

I agree. I was thinking about using different services for different tasks instead of putting everything into the same basket. I'm not self-hosting an email server either.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you self-host all the same services you have the same exposure level if root on your hosting machine is compromised. I suppose it depends on how confident you feel in how agile you can patch if a vulnerability becomes known in postfix for example. I wouldn’t consider self hosting something that reduces your cybersecurity risk typically

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago

I definitely trust Proton much more than I trust myself.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's true. But as we were speaking about an external service (Proton), I was thinking about diversification. I use Proton for emails, but I don't use Proton Pass opting for another external password manager.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

I agree that it would be very bad if your Proton account got compromised with so much data tied to it. However, I'm personally comfortable with a strong password and 2FA for my Proton account.