Linux

48328 readers

636 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

why do I get this message to upgrade to ubuntu pro after sudo apt upgrade? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by merompetehla@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

this never happened before, it's also not happening ion my backup computer (same OS, xubuntu 24.04).

Message: get more security updates through ubuntu pro with esm-apps enabled, learn more about ubuntu pro

How do I get rid of it.

Ubuntu never advertised itself so blatantly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] yala@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm very unfamiliar with Ubuntu, so I apologize for my ignorance. Is universe their AUR, COPR, OBS? I thought that PPAs were Ubuntu's user repository.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is what I dont understand too. No, it is for regular packages, not random 3rd party stuff.

Those are made on Launchpad and available as PPAs, originally meant to be the first step, followed by having them approved to Ubuntus repos.

[–] yala@discuss.online 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So, would it be fair to say that their packages suck and they're desperately fundraising money through ads in hopes of fixing it?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No. You are using a stable Distro. This is how stable distros work.

If you want upstream updates for all packages, use a rolling or semi-rolling release like Fedora, Arch, OpenSUSE, Gentoo, etc.

[–] yala@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But Debian does get security updates backported, right? Like, is Ubuntu actively preventing you from getting these?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I dont know how many packages they share but this seems very unrealistic.

Debian and Ubuntu have different release schedukes and package versions.

[–] yala@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

True. But Debian Testing and Unstable do exist. Which should be primary candidates for where Ubuntu gets their packages.