this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
401 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Been finding some good deals on 2.5 disks lately, but have never bought one before. Have a couple of 3.5 disks on the other hand in my Unraid server. Wondering how much it matters wether I get a 2.5 or not? What form factor do you prefer/usually go for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

3.5" are cheaper, go up to higher capacities (2.5" maxes out at only 5TB IIRC), and are easier to find cheap in used/refurb formats.

I wouldn't use 2.5" unless you absolutely had to for some reason.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The 2.5" drives are significantly more power efficient, often by a factor of 10. They also tend to be less noisy and produce less heat.

So in a small form factor NAS that isn't under heavy load, 2.5” drives are usually the better option.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It looks like about 2-3W with 2.5" vs 6-8W with 3.5"

So 3.5" drives are going to be more efficient, since you can get one that's 4x the capacity (20TB vs 5TB) for only a little over double the power usage.

Less noise is definitely a bonus if your NAS sits next to your workstation or something though.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is true that if you need a lot of space at some point 3.5" are going to be more efficient per GB, but usually people don't need hundreds of terabyte storage in a home NAS.

For normal applications in a home NAS that mostly sits idle, 2.5" drives run at about 1W and most are design to be able to be powered by normal USB, meaning 2.5W max.

3.5" drives on the other hand are usually designed for datacenter use, where power efficiency is a low priority and they usually take 5-10W in normal operation and and easily 15W when spinning up.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I don't even have all that much storage (18TB usable), the other side of things is I'd need 8x 5TB 2.5" drives in RAID 10 to be equal my 2x 18TB 3.5" drive mirror I have now, which means I'd need to add an HBA card that also consumes more power. Even if I ran RAIDz2 I'd still need 6 drives.

Price is another factor, from some poking around 2.5" is around 2x the cost of what I paid for my 3.5" drives.

[–] Cobrachicken@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yes. Chuck some 5TB Seagate externals. They're way less pain in the ears, cooler and quieter.