this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
233 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 126 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (52 children)

This isn't new at all. Apple has been consistent with long term updates for a while.

iPhones have been getting at least 5 major annual updates sense the iPhone 4. The average is 6 updates.

If anything, it gets to a point where the old hardware can barley handle the newer OS.

This is the equivalent of them promising to be called Apple in 5 years - it changes absolutly nothing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history

Edit: thinking about it, this gives them an excuse to reduce the number of years they support phones. Instead of 6-7, can we now expect that to become only 5 years?

This could be a huge loss disguised as a win

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (46 children)

Didn't Apple push updates to older devices that made them slower so that you'd buy their newest?

[–] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 50 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Depends how cynical you want to be and whether or not you trust Apple.

They claimed to slow things down so the aging batteries could run for close to as long as they could when they were new

[–] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just give me a performance slider so I can slow my phone down myself when I need it.

Anyway I have an android, battery lasts 2-3 days with normal usage (like 3h SoT per day for 3 days usage) so I don't think I'll have to worry about battery - and batteries are getting better with every new model, we'll eventually reach a point where they're a non-issue

[–] million@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It was more that older batteries can't handle the power draw, so they would shut down if the power draw spiked by an expensive operation.

It was a really bad user experience so Apple throttled so phones wouldn't crash.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If only they made their batteries easier to replace so this would be a non issue.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

They did offer cheap battery replacements to anyone with the affected models, essentially just covering the labor cost. Like $30 for a brand new battery.

No one makes batteries easy to replace on flagships these days because everyone is more concerned with waterproofing and form factor than they are with ease of battery replacement. I do miss the days of my old HTC Sensation, where I could just pop the back off and swap out the battery. I would carry around charged spares with me, so I would just turn off the phone, swap the battery, and have full battery instantly.

[–] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Oh I thought it was just to get some extra juice out of the batteries, thanks for the info

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)