this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
15 points (64.7% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The car already has water cooling anyway.

Car cooling cools the car, not the cable. If you're removing the cooling requirement from the cable you either burn up the cable or downrate the charging session to be significantly slower.

But the cable could also just be not hanging around freely.

Where are you proposing the cable go if not hanging/attached to the charger?

[โ€“] Eheran@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

The cable is with the car in this proposed case, why should the existing cooling not be able to cool it?

I'm the other case, of course it is connected to the charger. Just not freely dangling around outside for everyone to grab it. The same way the hoses of a fuel station mostly stay in the pump. Now just add a little bit more protection to this existing system and boom done.