this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
371 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (21 children)

NFT is scary because people don't know what it means. It is not supposed to be a means of selling jpegs; it is supposed to be a digital untamperable proof of ownership for various uses.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's not.

It's very tamperable. It lacks common safety features like 2FA. Hacks are common and stolen NFTs can not be recovered.

It doesn't provide any evidence of ownership, much less proof. Anyone can mint NFTs without providing any evidence of ownership or anything. There is no legal requirement that ownership of anything is transferred along with an NFT.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can’t believe in 2024 we still see NFT advocates. It was and continues to be a colossal waste of time and resources.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

It was a waste of time and resources for a particular application, yes. But the basic technology is useful for many applications.

Those "bored ape" NFTs were for jpeg images, do you also think that the jpeg algorithm was a colossal waste of time and resources?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)