this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
72 points (93.9% liked)
Games
16806 readers
998 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I find it sad that CP2077 isn't "good enough" to get a long chain of DLC while Starfield is.
I guess this is true of many games, but still...
I agree. I also think that in many ways Cyberpunk redeemed itself in public perception and financially. Whereas Starfield is very much still on the gutter with respect to both.
That's just it though, sales are good, it's still getting hype, people are playing it. It doesnt' feel like Cyberpunk gets the same hype and forgiveness as starfield.
I know people have complained about this for every BGS release since Oblivion (and I loved Oblivion), but it really seems egregious this time. Not because its broken but because it's so... blah.