Right, sorry for the confusion. I was referring to the definition of idealist "One whose conduct or thinking is influenced by ideals that often conflict with practical considerations. "

Not that I necessarily am "An adherent of any system of philosophical idealism."

But yes, I'll read more Marxist theory specifically. I don't have trouble interacting with leftists online very much, it's just when I see leftists who are strictly authoritarian. The "by any means necessary" just ain't it for me

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you meant, it's just that Marxists don't take on that mantle whatsoever. Same with your notion that we rely on some "super smart authoritarian," that goes against revolutionary theory.

That's why I suggested reading theory. You seem to have an idea of what you want your end to be, and why current Capitalism is bad, but you lack organizational and Dialectical Materialist theory.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's a reason we have realism in political science though. Theory isnt the truth of how things play out in real life, especially when it comes to the social sciences. We need descriptions just as much, if not moreso, than prescriptions.

I agree that theory is important tho, so I'll do my part by linking a free resource: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5GYwuvmAD_VyV6w5aFnnUw