this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16785 readers
761 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Beehaw.org gaming
Lemmy.ml gaming
lemmy.ca pcgaming
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
But can you explain why they did not start with one+two
In the direct, they said 3 1 2 is a good order to play
O have only played 11, so I am not familiar with it ,but that seemed very weird to me
Apparently 3 is a prequel to 1 and 2, though you can obviously play it 312 or 123, whichever you prefer.
I like 213 to travel back in time as I go.
It's supposed to be the chronological order, and I imagine the games are separate enough, with only loose connections, that it doesn't really matter in this case.
Because really, chronological is not the best order for many stories.
One of the best known examples is Star Wars, where episodes 4-5 lose a lot of their power if you've seen the prequels first.
A video game example would be Beaten Kaitos Origins, which is IMO one of the best attempt at a prequel ever. It completely turns the interpretation of the first game on its head, and makes both better because of it. It would ruin the effect to play BKO first.