this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
276 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

72739 readers
1577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Because computers have come even close to needing more than 16 exabytes of memory for anything. And how many applications need to do basic mathematical operations on numbers greater than 2^64. Most applications haven't even exceeded the need for 32 bit operations, so really the push to 64bit was primarily to appease more than 4GB of memory without slow workarounds.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know a google engineer who was saying they're having to update their code bases to handle > 16 exabytes of storage, if you can imagine. But yeah, that's storage, not RAM.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I would kind of enjoy the trouble of needing to store and owning the place for 16 exabytes...

load more comments (5 replies)