this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
737 points (94.9% liked)

Greentext

4459 readers
730 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you're in the act of shooting the gun, the saftey routinely gets in the way and requires training in an extra step before firing,

Sounds like a good thing to me. How long could it possibly take?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

It's not actually the amount of time that it takes that's the problem. With pistols that have safeties, the proper training is (usually) to turn the safety off when raising the gun. The problem is that it's a critical step you can mess up or forget to do under stress. Then you're left with a dead trigger having just pulled a gun in a situation you viewed as dangerous enough to require shooting someone. You're also stressed to hell and unlikely to think "oh yes, my safety!" Throw in that these kinds of situations are ones where half a second can make a big difference, and the saftey is just another thing that can go wrong.

There's certainly tradeoffs, since not having a safety means it's more likely your mistakes will result in a round being fired, but you can layer other procedures and devices to minimize that risk. In the end, it's a feature that even the gun community can't agree on, which is why some guns have them and some don't.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Depends on the situation? Taking time isn't as important as establishing intent.