Selfhosted

40296 readers

225 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

172

Google Photos Alternative (lemmy.brennoflavio.com.br)

submitted 10 months ago by brenno@lemmy.brennoflavio.com.br to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

110 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I'm using Nextcloud but I'm thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I've found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

My money's going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users.

holy shit

[–] azron@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The user feature is available for non paying users too. If you want a gui for managing that is now behind plus. I don't see exactly how wantng to make a living off of your work makes you a greedy cunt especially when it seems the features trickle down as they should. Am I missing something?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's about expectation setting. You can't say "paid donators will get X" then say "actually you won't, give us more money for X".

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 12 points 10 months ago

Also, there's usually no reason as a user to pay monthly for a feature in a self-hosted application.
The Dev has no monthly costs for that feature. Let me buy the application/feature, and if you need money for a new feature, create a feature that is worth buying again. No need to bully the user into a monthly subscription...

[–] azron@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

I missed that bait and switch. Thank you for the response.