this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
78 points (95.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40359 readers
347 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
78
New apartment Internet has no port forwarding, admin login (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by johnnixon@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Pro: 1Gb upload and download speeds on free Internet provided by the HOA. Con: As a self hoster, I have zero control over it. No port forwarding, no DMZ, no bridge mode. It's Starbucks free WiFi with a wired connection.

Option A: Buy Google Fiber and don't use free Internet. Option B: Create some elaborate tunnel through a VPS.

My public self hosted activities are fairly low bandwidth (password manager, SSH). I have a vague idea that I could point my domain to a low cost VPS that has a VPN tunnel into my home network for any incoming connection needs. That may require me to fill in port forwards on both systems but whatever. Tailscale is serving most of my remote needs but I still need a few ports. This does not fix the issue of online gaming port forwards (Nintendo Switch online requires a huge forwarded range for best performance) but oh well for now.

UPDATE: I think they're using this system. https://www.cambiumnetworks.com/markets/multi-family-living/ The personal Wi-Fi overview makes it clear each AP is given it's own VLAN which sounds a whole lot like the whole building is sharing one IP and there's no way I'm going to get my own Internet access. They even detail how you can roam the building and maintain your WiFi connection across your neighbor's and the common areas APs. This is the IPV4 future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 96 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Haven't had to use port forwarding for gaming in like 30 or so years, so I just looked up Nintendo's website...

Within the port range, enter the starting port and the ending port to forward. For the Nintendo Switch console, this is port 1024 through 65535

LMAO, no thanks, that's not happening.

For your question, you could likely route everything through a tunnel and manage the port forwarding on the other end of the tunnel.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

WTF? Nintendo wants you to get that wide open? 🤣

[–] johnnixon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I actually gave it 44000-65535 and it's connecting well. That's another reason why I wanted a more robust network: IOT VLAN to segregate that risk.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

That's how I have it at home. 6 VLANs total. Even IoT and Media/games are separated from each other.

load more comments (2 replies)