Linux

This is the fun way. I have a ton of configuration files in git and I symlink to them from various places with an install script. And zshrc has enough brains to determine the OS it's running under and the hostname. Between those two, I can have it do all the Right Things no matter what system it's on. So far, it deploys to my personal Mac, my work Mac, my personal Linux box, my SDF account, and my Android phone with tmux.

Basically I clone the repo into .local/share/beejsys and then run the install script and everything just works. And I don't typically have to rerun the install script after a pull.

Bash syntax - I recommend Unix Power Tools by O'Reilly, but it is more advanced so maybe start with a basic version. People look at me funny whenever I say this, but I started myself with something like Unix for Dummies. Why not!?

Keep in mind that this is no trivial task: bash is basically a programming language unto itself - it even has conditionals, loops, variables, etc. Yet SO worth it if you use Unix and want to know more what it is doing.

You also should have a basic familiarity with Unix foundationals as well, to know why something such as this is very dangerous:

export PATH="~/bin/:$PATH"

So, the easy way would be to just take the nice file, copy it wherever you want, and leave it at that. The hard way of actually understanding it may require a deeper dive into Unix. Unix Power Tools, with the picture of a drill on the cover, or maybe someone will recommend a better option but that's what comes to my mind.

Have fun!:-)

So you can do what you like, but if you are going down the road of shell customization, I recommend you first consider if bash is the shell you want to keep by googling around and reading some articles.

I personally use ZSH (and I cannibalized ohmyzsh for the few configs I wanted instead of taking the whole giant bastard of a thing) but fsh is a fine choice if you don't care about posix (a different discussion). There are some other options to consider as well, but if you're gonna configure, don't do it then do it again in a month with different syntax lol.

I've only started using yadm recently so I may not be able to elaborate in detail, but for me the main draw for using yadm (as opposed to Ansible, which I use at work) is the simplicity. It's basically just a bash script that uses git, so there's no dependencies besides git and tools installed on most Unix systems. Ansible felt like overkill for what I needed, ie just something to manage and sync my dotfiles.

Also, maybe it's personal bias, but I really hate installing/using Python-based programs - they often tend to go wild with their dependencies and eventually break. I recall trying to install Ansible on a Raspberry Pi at some point (via pip) and it failed because one of the dependencies couldn't be compiled for whatever reason. I gave up after trying to fix it for a while, and dropped the idea. I've had similar experiences with other large Python projects, there's always some drama. Why is why I prefer compiled binaries or simple shell scripts like yadm.

I've no issues using Ansible at work though. We use it on RHEL so it's quite stable and doesn't have the dependency issues you'd get on a bleeding-edge, ever-changing, end-user system. Plus it really shines at the Infrastructure as Code stuff so we use it to automate everything from networking gear to VMs. But I feel it's overkill for something as simple as syncing a bunch of text files.