Linux

48338 readers

730 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

125

/media or /mnt or anywhere ? Discussion. (lemmy.today)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gpstarman@lemmy.today to c/linux@lemmy.ml

165 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Where should I mount my internal drive partitions?

As far as I searched on the internet, I came to know that

/Media = mount point for removable media that system do it itself ( usb drive , CD )

/Mnt = temporarily mounting anything manually

I can most probably mount anything wherever I want, but if that's the case what's the point of /mnt? Just to be organised I suppose.

TLDR

If /mnt is for temporary and /media is for removable where should permanent non-removable devices/partitions be mounted. i.e. an internal HDD which is formatted as NTFS but needs to be automounted at startup?

Asking with the sole reason to know that, what's the practice of user who know Linux well, unlike me.

I know this is a silly question but I asked anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Jesse, WTF are you talking about?

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm an OpenBSD user, but it shouldn't be hard to translate this to Linux:

If the partition I want to mount is /dev/sd0i, and sd0's UID/DUID is 3c6905d2260afe09, I mount /dev/sd0i at /3c6905d2260afe09.i. fstab entry looks like

3c6905d2260afe09.i /3c6905d2260afe09.i ffs rw,whatever_flags 0 0

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ik bro, but having whole bunch of random numbers as mount point seems less intuitive to me.

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

well diskletters/numbers can change between boots and hardware configurations, and unless you have a good label for the partition, this is the only way I can think of to name your permanent mount points that isn't problematic/incorrect in some other way. This will always work correctly with any amount of partitions with any amount of disks; and it's not exactly hard to get the DUID of a disk, at least on OpenBSD. It's also highly scriptable as such.

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the info.