this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
649 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsonjson@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 months ago (10 children)

I used to help maintain a Linux distro, and there is a level of polish Windows has that I feel cannot be reached by the FOSS ecosystem due the resources dumped into hiring dedicated teams at MS. Microsoft has tons of money. I'm sad about the direction of windows, but it generally works pretty well for how it's designed (which is in some cases awful).

[–] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I agree with your point, but I never would have thought of describing Windows as "polished".

[–] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sure. I could accept hearing "Windows is more polished than most Linux distro's". But to say blankly that Windows is polished is crazy talk. It's jank as balls. Its got like 3 totally discrete and independent UI frameworks for the menus operating in parallel, and somehow none of them provide all the functionality you would need, have to mix and match them.

That's just a single example. I could rant for hours.

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

please do, i LOVE long rants about windows :]

load more comments (6 replies)