this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
164 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm going to jump in and say that the real question isn't "is the disagree button bad" the real question is, "is the disagree button worse than not having it"?

I don't use downvote to disagree. I know some people do. But on Lemmy I've seen so many times awful comments with positive up notes bc no one is downvoting and hiding them

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That’s not really the question either. The question is “why do we have a downvote button/what do we hope it accomplishes?”

If your goal is to have an agree/disagree binary to sort all content, then power to you because that is how it is used. But a lot of people, not just myself, don’t want that.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I disagree with "that is how it will be used" because that is not the only way people use it. Self-moderation is more of a pro than agree/disagree is a con.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Self moderation clearly isn’t working if you ask me. Otherwise we wouldn’t have mods in the first place.

I also didn’t say it was the exclusive usage but it’s certainly the dominant one.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how you draw that conclusion. It's not either or, you have downvoting and mods working together

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Let’s kind of refocus here because there are 3 things at play.

1: What do you think we need downvotes for, 2: do you think that’s how they’re being used, and 3: are there better tools to accomplish #1?

After that it’s an assessment of other potential cons.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think we disagree on 1. I think we need them for signaling what is acceptable and what is unacceptable, but you do not think this is necessary 2. We disagree on this, with me thinking that it is used enough to be useful and you thinking it is not. 3. We disagree on this as well: I don't think it's sustainable or healthy for mods to shoulder this burden alone in a reddit-style format. Exceptions being perhaps ask-historians who have a very hardworking (volunteer) team and a very niche focus.

Now to make the strongest counter argument against myself: I've been to some popular subreddits where some awful things are upvoted a lot, and contrary takes are downvoted. But even this is not too bad because it just signals to me that I don't want to be part of that community, and find somewhere that's more in alignment with how I want voting to be used.

To make the argument for downvoting, on other subreddits I've seen comments with -10, and when I open them I see they were trolling/abuse or something, and it confirms my confidence in that community that the overwhelming majority of people do not want to allow that comment, vs just one mod minimizing it, or removing it completely.

Let me know what your think