this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
824 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hope this isn't a repeated submission. Funny how they're trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (36 children)

And I agree with them, I mean 23andMe should have a brute-force resistant login implementation and 2FA, but you know that when you create an account.

If you are reusing creds you should expect to be compromised pretty easily.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (21 children)

A successful breach of a family member's account due to their bad security shouldn't result in the breach of my account. That's the problem.

Edit: so people stop asking, here's their docs on DNA relatives: https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/212170838

Showing your genetic ancestry results makes select information available to your matches in DNA Relatives

It clearly says select information, which one could reasonably assume is protecting of your privacy. All the reports seem to imply the hackers got access to much more than just the couple fun numbers the UI shows you.

At minimum I hold them responsible for not thinking this feature through enough that it could be used for racial profiling. That's the equivalent of being searchable on Facebook but they didn't think to not make your email, location and phone number available to everyone who searches for you. I want to be discoverable by my friends and family but I'm not intending to make more than my name and picture available.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

A successful breach of a family member’s account due to their bad security shouldn’t result in the breach of my account. That’s the problem

I mean...

You volunteered to share your info with that person.

And that person reused a email/password that was compromised.

How can 23andme prevent that?

It sucks, but it's the fault of your relative that you entrusted with access to your information.

No different than if you handed them a hardcopy and they left it on the table of McDonald's .

Quick edit:

It sounds like you think your account would be compromised, that's not what happened. Only info you shared with the compromised relative becomes compromised. They don't magically get your password.

But you still choose to make it accessible to that relatives account by accepting their request to share

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could I please have your personal information?

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ok, who else would be able to give me your personal information. I'll go get it from them instead.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your mom has my contact information. You can ask her.

/pwn3d.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And that’s exactly how the attackers got in in the first place lol.

The ding dongs used the same creds elsewhere which were leaked.

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for explaining the point I was making to me.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ah I misread the thread somehow.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)