Games

16806 readers

1000 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

How Japan has avoided the gaming industry’s persistent layoffs (www.theverge.com)

submitted 4 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

one of the key provisions of the country’s employment law, specifically on the “doctrine of abusive dismissal,” is that “employers can’t just shed employees.” They can only do so, says Matanle, “when the employer can prove that the organization would go bust.”

Should a Japanese company be found to break the law by, say, reducing its workforce to cynically juice the numbers of a quarterly report, dismissed employees are liable to be reinstated. “You can imagine the relationship problems,” says Matanle, “of staff who have won a court case against the organization for aggressive dismissal.”

Sure would like some of those employment rights here in America right about now.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Obviously Japan has got their employment rights policies more correct than the US but there are some trade-offs to having policies like this. The main one would be that employers are less likely to "give a chance" to a candidate who has limited experience entering an industry if it is difficult to fire them when if it doesn't work out.

Economists have pointed to this being a factor in high youth unemployment rates in countries like France and Spain.

[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Indeed. Every job requires experience, but you have no chance of earning that experience unless you already have it, so no there's way of getting that job.