this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
224 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
224
US antitrust case against Apple’s App Store exclusivity is ‘firing on all cylinders’ (9to5mac.com)
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

US antitrust case against Apple’s App Store exclusivity is ‘firing on all cylinders’::The US antitrust case against Apple’s App Store exclusivity is “firing on all cylinders” according to the head of the...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

(3) is by far the most important, but I can't see how it will get attention from legislators or regulators.

Also, even if it happens, how could we ensure that service providers (say a bank) don't start enforcing hardware based attestation?

We'd either need non-attested devices to be common enough for them not to bother blocking them (we are here now), or explicitly protect the right to software freedom. Maybe as part of a more general right-to-repair?