this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
100 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
100
To what extent, if at all, would have CrowdStrike's faulty update have been easier to deal with with an immutable distro? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by snek_boi@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In the best case it could automatically reboot into working configuration.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And download the update again

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No we are having some fun!

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

How does Falcon store these channel files on Linux? I don't know how an immutable distro would handle this given CrowdStrike push several of these updates per day and presumably use their own infrastructure to deploy them.

I guess if you pay them enough they could customize the deployment to work with whatever infrastructure you have but it's all proprietary so I have no idea if they're really doing that anywhere.