this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
378 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16800 readers
789 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
378
Indie developer behind 'Overwhelmingly Positive' rated shipbuilder argues that Steam's "free advertising" is worth the 30% cut (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 4 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
130 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course it's relevant.

It's why the PC market is what it is.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am not arguing about why the market is the way it is, it’s not relevant.

I am saying regardless of how we got here, valve controls the PC game market, and that will always be a liability no matter who is in control. We have to be sober about this.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Valve controls the PC market because they created the PC market and are responsible for the overwhelming majority of its progress. And they have done nothing remotely abusive with it.

They've justified their cut and are fully entitled to it.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I agree they have not been abusive, but no they are not entitled to anything. That is a ridiculous outlook. You’re talking about a for-profit company dude. Stop letting your worship of Gabe cloud your judgment. Again, I like valve/steam a lot. I use it practically every day and I am happy to. The service is fantastic and they have earned their place at the top. But I really do not understand how you can’t see the potential issue with such overwhelming dominance. You seriously think there is nothing to worry about ever?

How they got to the top is not relevant.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are entitled to a fair cut of sales through their platform. That's how platforms work.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Dude the tunnel vision here jfc. I’m done. Last word is all yours. I’m sure it’s very important to you.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

You're the one disqualifying the huge service they're providing.

They're exactly as entitled to their cut of sales on their platform as the developers of the games are to get paid for their game.