Selfhosted

40347 readers

328 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Which is better for my network, an extender or another router? (toast.ooo)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by BeefBeeferson@toast.ooo to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Background: I am migrating from a Gen 1 Google WiFi mesh router and pulled the trigger and bought this router on prime day. TP-Link Tri-Band BE19000 WiFi 7 Router (Archer BE800) - https://a.co/d/en9OlMz

Huge upgrade, outside a few spots in my house where it's pretty spotty. I cannot easily move the router due to not having a basement, nor approval from the wife to break through a bunch of walls to wire it up how I want it.

So the question is... Do I get the BE11000 range extender that is currently $300

TP-Link Tri-Band BE9300 WiFi 7 Router Archer BE550 - https://a.co/d/bUat5G4 which is currently $250. The speed difference isn't a deal breaker for me on the other devices. My computers are hard-line and happy next to the router.

Or do I just say screw it and return it and go back to a mesh system.

I am currently unable to connect the second node to a wired connection, but I have a plan on getting that done this coming year once I get wife buy-in...

Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

His router is tri-band though meaning it has 2 5ghz transceivers. With an extender usually you use one of them as a backplane for ap->ap communication so it doesn't interfere with your performance.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

His router is tri-band though meaning it has 2 5ghz transceivers.

Unfortunately, for many models - like the Linksys WRT 3200ACM - that second antenna (technically the third one if you include the 2.4Ghz one) doesn’t function at all without the manufacturer’s firmware. It’s a dead stick with any third-party firmware, and is 100% software-enabled.

I have found this fact to be reliable whether it is DD-WRT or OpenWRT, and across several different manufacturers including Asus and D-Link.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago

This thread is just full of super useful info. Cheers and thanks!

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm living in WiFi 5 world so this is new info to me. Neat. Thanks for the heads up.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Wifi 5 vs 6, 6E and 7 are worlds different. A LOT has changed in that time.

It was either 6 or 7 that was designed with mesh/extenders in mind, and it actually works really well if you have good hardware.

Also even in the wifi 5 days they made mesh/extenders explicitly with duplex issues in mind. Just about every high end wifi 5 system had at least dual band wifi, with most having 3.