this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

Fediverse

28465 readers
532 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And from lemmy.world?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iso@lemy.lol 104 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

It's been over for so long that it's almost forgotten, huh? Here's the announcement: https://beehaw.org/post/567170

As I remember, it was about open registration policy and poor moderation.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m surprised they haven’t re-federated by now. I kind of got the impression it would be temporary during the main Reddit migration but I guess not. I really like the beehaw community but it definitely seems inconvenient to not be able to access all of those bigger communities on world and shjw.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have noticed that a lot of the most irritating and vocal reactionaries come from those two instances, and it's not improving much. It makes sense - this is an alternative to reddit and the people most likely to leave reddit will include a large number of people who get banned a lot.

If they're reactionaries, they're not going to have many instances that are for them specifically - because those instances get defedded - so they will tend to go for the open instances. So those instances get a lot of the worst people.

And if their goal is growth at the expense of quality, then they won't fix it. They'll just get worse. The reasons beehaw defederated haven't changed.

load more comments (5 replies)