this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1250 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 227 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (31 children)

yeah. like my manufacturers' 3-year-old, full-o-spyware ROM is more secure than latest clean installed lineage.

they just want control, not security. and with banking apps becoming a necessity, i'm starting to be forced to return to stock.

[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Myself, I use my bank's web portal via my mobile browser. Not as instant as an app, but it gets the job done.

[–] MSugarhill@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Culprit is: I need the phones app as second factor to log in to the web interface.

[–] HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Graphene os + a work profile + sandboxed play services allows you to have some baking apps. Ive got 3 and they all work without a hitch.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)