this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
266 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12344 readers
550 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/23849795

The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 84 points 3 months ago (3 children)

FTA:

Disney is calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed because her husband signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service years prior.

The company says signing up for the trial requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company.

I'm pretty freaking sure that even if the dispute was hypothetically with Disney+ streaming, rather than a theme park/restaraunt.... it's still not enforceable.

But This? only reason it's not patently ridiculous is because this is how Disney wins lawsuits: they'll bring hundreds of bullshit motions to drown the plaintiff in legal fees until they simply go away.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

They could have easily settled this.

I'm hoping now they and other scumbag companies get taken to task for how fucking ridiculous their bullshit catch all clauses are.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah exactly, unless the US judical system is even more fucked up than I believe already, this makes no sense. Nevermind how enforced-arbitration doesn't work in most of the world, the agreement would be with Disney+ the streaming arm, not Disney park operations.